
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec rhoncus neque sed nibh sagittis, fringilla porttitor ipsum tristique. Nulla interdum ex et nisi vehicula, id laoreet nisl ultricies. Phasellus vitae magna ac lacus dictum tincidunt. Sed iaculis metus nec viverra pulvinar. Etiam id nisi eu turpis mattis imperdiet ac ac tortor. Aliquam at ipsum dui. Etiam pharetra consequat massa. Aenean nec lectus sit amet metus pharetra dapibus. Pellentesque interdum ex eget nisi fringilla, id semper erat rhoncus. Suspendisse lectus leo, malesuada pharetra commodo a, sollicitudin eu erat. Nullam justo nisl, tincidunt vel auctor id, luctus a tellus.
Pellentesque sollicitudin mauris sit amet enim volutpat, at faucibus sem laoreet. Morbi egestas ex non orci interdum, ut elementum orci faucibus. Maecenas et sem convallis erat dignissim facilisis. Quisque purus sapien, pellentesque euismod varius id, fermentum nec nibh. Integer commodo dignissim ipsum, ac accumsan metus fringilla sit amet. Aenean aliquam sem finibus tempor venenatis. Aliquam ac facilisis turpis, eu posuere ipsum.

In nisi dui, ultricies sit amet gravida vel, ullamcorper vel mauris. Aliquam nec sapien odio. Sed vitae suscipit felis. Nullam semper blandit lectus, eu finibus urna fermentum et. Aliquam vehicula ligula nibh, non efficitur massa iaculis et. Vestibulum vitae euismod odio, non maximus nulla. Sed viverra porta enim ac interdum. Maecenas auctor tristique auctor. Nullam et neque nec tortor malesuada ullamcorper. Pellentesque ac fringilla ante, non convallis est. Proin velit augue, rutrum vitae ipsum vel, malesuada dictum urna. Nunc vulputate sit amet odio vitae ullamcorper. Nullam suscipit ornare eros, et viverra sapien hendrerit quis. Donec odio eros, ultricies a risus quis, efficitur elementum turpis. Etiam interdum diam quis turpis ultricies.
Sed non sapien eros. Duis fringilla fringilla lectus sit amet aliquam. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vivamus molestie, felis rutrum luctus pulvinar, libero metus eleifend mauris, semper malesuada ante eros vitae eros. Phasellus vitae dolor faucibus, laoreet lectus quis, placerat nisi. Nam ornare nulla id est aliquet, quis fringilla neque congue. Duis facilisis sed massa vel bibendum. Curabitur sollicitudin tristique commodo. Vivamus facilisis venenatis nibh. Integer placerat elementum felis, id consequat lorem consectetur a. Duis laoreet sit amet nisl in eleifend. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus.
Proin eros lacus, pellentesque sed vehicula a, luctus non nibh. Nulla diam sem, posuere ac odio varius, ultrices tristique nibh. Morbi dictum scelerisque convallis. Praesent faucibus lorem lacus, id luctus justo feugiat et. Curabitur eget tellus non nisi interdum blandit. Maecenas pulvinar est sed ex elementum, ac commodo diam bibendum. Nulla auctor dolor felis, sit amet euismod ante eleifend non. Donec id neque magna.
Out of 34,208 active finance and accounting postings in our database as of November 2026, 438 name Deltek or Costpoint, which is 1.3% and the kind of number that makes an ERP vendor look like a rounding error. Narrow to the 863 postings that talk like a government contractor, meaning they mention DCAA, cost-plus, incurred cost, indirect rates, FAR, DFARS or cost accounting standards, and Deltek or Costpoint appears in 172 of them, about one in five, ahead of Oracle (108), SAP (102), Workday (63), Unanet (58), NetSuite (53) and QuickBooks (40).
I find that gap more interesting than any market share chart, because it says the software question for a government contractor is mostly a compliance question wearing a software costume. We track 80,000+ accounting and finance postings, cleaned of duplicates and recruiter noise, with every job linking to the employer's own career page, and job postings show who is actually hired to run a system, which is a different thing from who owns the licenses. A posting count can't tell you what's installed, only what an employer is paying a human to operate, so hold the percentages loosely.
Because a cost-reimbursement contract makes your books part of the deal. The government pays your allowable costs, so your system has to prove which costs belong to which contract, and what you charge is only as defensible as the ledger behind it. The DCAA's pre-award accounting system adequacy checklist is aimed at contractors that are new to government contracting, hold cost-reimbursement contracts or receive progress payments, and it's how they show the system is designed to meet the SF 1408 criteria that DCAA auditors then check in a pre-award survey.
From what I know of that form, the criteria come down to separating direct costs from indirect costs, accumulating costs by contract under general ledger control, allocating indirect pools consistently, and tracking labor by project through a timekeeping system. A generic small business ledger can do some of that with enough spreadsheets bolted on, and honestly that's where most of these companies start, but the further you go into cost-type work the more the system itself starts to matter, and nobody enjoys finding that out in the middle of an audit.
Deltek or Costpoint leads at 172 of the 863 postings (20%), followed by Oracle at 108 (13%), SAP at 102 (12%), Workday at 63 (7%), Unanet at 58 (7%), NetSuite at 53 (6%) and QuickBooks at 40 (5%). I can't tell which Oracle product a posting means, so treat that number as a family and not a specific ERP. Excel is named in 571 of the 863 (66%), which is the least glamorous and most reliable finding in the whole data set, and a pretty good reminder that half the vendor hype in this category is bullshit next to a spreadsheet that works.
One in five is a lead, but the other four in five don't name Deltek, and that matters for anyone building a career or buying a system. Some government work sits inside big companies that run enterprise ERPs, and plenty of smaller contractors clearly run something lighter, since the postings name everything from Workday to QuickBooks. If you're comparing options, our accounting software directory is a decent place to see how the general-purpose systems stack up, and the Sage Intacct vs NetSuite comparison covers the mid-market path many growing companies consider.
No, they're separate Deltek products and the postings name them separately. Across the 438 finance postings that name Deltek or Costpoint, Costpoint appears in 278, Vantagepoint in 91, Vision in 32 and Ajera in 18, with some postings naming more than one. About 126 name Costpoint without Vantagepoint, Vision or Ajera and about 111 name one of those three without Costpoint, so the two product families split the demand almost evenly.
The employers naming Deltek most often are a mix, with defense and services firms like KBR, Booz Allen Hamilton, Leidos, CACI and Anduril alongside professional services and engineering firms like Cherry Bekaert, Kimley-Horn and DOWL. I can't tell you from the postings which product each one runs, but the spread suggests "Deltek" on a resume or a posting can mean two fairly different environments, and if you're hiring or applying it's worth asking which one before you assume.
Of the 438 Deltek or Costpoint postings, 221 show an annual pay range, with a median midpoint of $101,000, against $115,000 for the finance postings that name NetSuite. The seniority mix isn't identical, so use that as a rough read and not a verdict, but it suggests Deltek is an entry ticket to a specialty more than a premium skill by itself.
What goes with it is more telling. Of the 438, 151 mention indirect rates, incurred cost, cost accounting standards or FAR (34%), 132 name a CPA (30%), 85 mention a security clearance (19%) and 80 name DCAA (18%), and 313 still ask for Excel (71%). The software rides along with a body of rules, and the people who get paid well tend to know the rules.
If you're a job seeker, skip the software tutorials for a minute and learn how fringe, overhead and G&A pools roll up into an indirect rate, because that's the part of a Deltek job no demo shows you and it's what those 151 postings are screening for. Then build a small indirect rate calculator in a spreadsheet using made-up numbers, since just building something, anything, will teach you more than a certificate, and if you've been dabbling with AI, ask it to poke holes in your allocation logic, which is the kind of tedious checking it does well. Pair it with the broader look at what software employers ask for and you'll know where Deltek sits among everything else.
If you run finance at a contractor heading toward your first cost-type contract, read the DCAA checklist before you pick a vendor, and ask each one how it handles indirect pools and timekeeping rather than how long implementation takes. QuickBooks appears in 40 of these 863 postings, so some contractors clearly work with it, but whether that survives a DCAA survey is a question for your auditor, not for a posting count, and finding out late is a pissed-off-CFO kind of lesson. If you're project-based but not federal, the construction accounting software guide covers a similar job-costing problem, and the remote accounting jobs list is worth a scan if you're after government-adjacent finance work, with every listing linking straight to the employer.
The most frequently named is Deltek, with Costpoint and Vantagepoint as the main products, appearing in 172 of 863 government-contractor finance postings (20%). Oracle, SAP, Workday, Unanet and NetSuite follow, and Excel appears in two thirds of them.
No, they're different Deltek products. Postings name Costpoint about three times as often as Vantagepoint across the 438 Deltek-related finance postings (278 versus 91), and some postings name more than one, so check which one an employer means.
It's the form behind the pre-award accounting system survey. Per the DCAA, contractors new to government contracting, with cost-reimbursement contracts or receiving progress payments use the checklist to show how their accounting system is designed to meet the SF 1408 criteria, and DCAA auditors use it in a pre-award survey.
Not always. About 80% of the 863 government-contractor postings don't name Deltek or Costpoint, while 66% name Excel, and a third of the Deltek postings mention indirect rate, incurred cost or cost accounting standards knowledge.
Some appear to, since QuickBooks is named in 40 of the 863 postings. Whether your setup satisfies a DCAA review depends on your contract type, so confirm it with your auditor before you rely on it.
The software is the visible part of a much bigger system of rules, and the people who learn the rules first get to choose the software later. Start with the rate calculator.