
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec rhoncus neque sed nibh sagittis, fringilla porttitor ipsum tristique. Nulla interdum ex et nisi vehicula, id laoreet nisl ultricies. Phasellus vitae magna ac lacus dictum tincidunt. Sed iaculis metus nec viverra pulvinar. Etiam id nisi eu turpis mattis imperdiet ac ac tortor. Aliquam at ipsum dui. Etiam pharetra consequat massa. Aenean nec lectus sit amet metus pharetra dapibus. Pellentesque interdum ex eget nisi fringilla, id semper erat rhoncus. Suspendisse lectus leo, malesuada pharetra commodo a, sollicitudin eu erat. Nullam justo nisl, tincidunt vel auctor id, luctus a tellus.
Pellentesque sollicitudin mauris sit amet enim volutpat, at faucibus sem laoreet. Morbi egestas ex non orci interdum, ut elementum orci faucibus. Maecenas et sem convallis erat dignissim facilisis. Quisque purus sapien, pellentesque euismod varius id, fermentum nec nibh. Integer commodo dignissim ipsum, ac accumsan metus fringilla sit amet. Aenean aliquam sem finibus tempor venenatis. Aliquam ac facilisis turpis, eu posuere ipsum.

In nisi dui, ultricies sit amet gravida vel, ullamcorper vel mauris. Aliquam nec sapien odio. Sed vitae suscipit felis. Nullam semper blandit lectus, eu finibus urna fermentum et. Aliquam vehicula ligula nibh, non efficitur massa iaculis et. Vestibulum vitae euismod odio, non maximus nulla. Sed viverra porta enim ac interdum. Maecenas auctor tristique auctor. Nullam et neque nec tortor malesuada ullamcorper. Pellentesque ac fringilla ante, non convallis est. Proin velit augue, rutrum vitae ipsum vel, malesuada dictum urna. Nunc vulputate sit amet odio vitae ullamcorper. Nullam suscipit ornare eros, et viverra sapien hendrerit quis. Donec odio eros, ultricies a risus quis, efficitur elementum turpis. Etiam interdum diam quis turpis ultricies.
Sed non sapien eros. Duis fringilla fringilla lectus sit amet aliquam. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vivamus molestie, felis rutrum luctus pulvinar, libero metus eleifend mauris, semper malesuada ante eros vitae eros. Phasellus vitae dolor faucibus, laoreet lectus quis, placerat nisi. Nam ornare nulla id est aliquet, quis fringilla neque congue. Duis facilisis sed massa vel bibendum. Curabitur sollicitudin tristique commodo. Vivamus facilisis venenatis nibh. Integer placerat elementum felis, id consequat lorem consectetur a. Duis laoreet sit amet nisl in eleifend. Interdum et malesuada fames ac ante ipsum primis in faucibus.
Proin eros lacus, pellentesque sed vehicula a, luctus non nibh. Nulla diam sem, posuere ac odio varius, ultrices tristique nibh. Morbi dictum scelerisque convallis. Praesent faucibus lorem lacus, id luctus justo feugiat et. Curabitur eget tellus non nisi interdum blandit. Maecenas pulvinar est sed ex elementum, ac commodo diam bibendum. Nulla auctor dolor felis, sit amet euismod ante eleifend non. Donec id neque magna.
We're tracking 7,877 live tax postings right now, and only 760 of them, about 9.6%, name a professional tax preparation product at all. Among those, the CCH family (Axcess and ProSystem fx) shows up in 640, UltraTax in 112, Lacerte in 73, Drake in 33. Meanwhile the most-cited survey of people who actually prepare returns says Drake is the best-rated tax software in the business and the second most used, and those two pictures barely overlap, which is the useful part if you're deciding what to learn or what to buy. Counts are as of October 2026 and a posting that lists three products counts for each of them, so the numbers overlap a bit.
The best data is the Journal of Accountancy's annual survey, and the 2025 tax software survey heard from 2,011 AICPA members who prepared 2024 returns for a fee, fielded June 2 through 20, 2025. UltraTax CS led usage at 22.9%, followed by Drake Tax at 16.3%, Lacerte at 15.8%, CCH Axcess Tax at 12.5%, ProSeries at 10.5%, CCH ProSystem fx at 8.3% and ATX at 4.6%. Drake took the highest overall rating at 4.4 on the 1-to-5 scale and the top marks for busy-season updates and support, and it was the outlier on price, with 85.1% of its users liking what they pay and only 8.2% disliking it, while cost was the most common complaint about nearly everything else.
The CCH family dominates. It appears in 640 postings, which is 84% of the 760 that name any preparer product, even though the two CCH products together make up about 21% of the survey. UltraTax, the usage leader at 22.9%, shows up in 112 postings, about 15% of the named-product postings, and Drake sits at 33, roughly 4%, against a 16.3% share of actual preparers. Lacerte is named in 73 postings, ProSeries and ProConnect in 29, and ATX in 2. The overlap matters here since postings tend to read like a list (one asks for 'UltraTax, CCH, Drake, Lacerte, ProSeries, or similar'), so treat the shares as rough, though the direction is hard to argue with.
I can't prove this, but my read is that hiring is the difference. Drake's strength is with small and mid-size practices, and those firms fill seats through referrals, local networks and the partner's cousin more than through a long job description on a board, while the firms posting at volume tend to run the big platforms or write something vaguer. The vaguer part is real: 906 of the 7,877 postings just say 'tax software' or 'professional tax software' without naming anything, which is more than any single product gets except CCH. So the posting data tells you what larger employers write down, and the survey tells you what the people doing the work have on their desktop, and neither is wrong, they just measure different hiring habits.
Different world, different stack. In the same 7,877 postings, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE appears in 526 (6.7%), more than any preparer product except CCH, Corptax in 162, and Alteryx in 207 (2.6%). In-house tax teams are buying provision, compliance and data-prep tools rather than return-prep desktops, and Excel is named in 5,043 of the postings (64%) regardless of which side you sit on. If you're aiming at corporate tax, ONESOURCE and Alteryx are the lines on the resume that match the postings, and the career-ladder side of this shows up in our look at remote tax accountant jobs.
If you're job hunting in public accounting, list the whole family of what you've touched (CCH Axcess, UltraTax, Lacerte, whatever it was) instead of agonizing over one, since a hiring manager is mostly checking that you've worked a full return cycle in a professional package and the switching cost between them is small next to knowing the return itself. Ask what they run in the first screen and be straight about the gaps, because 'or similar' appears in these postings for a reason. If you're picking software for your own firm, read the survey's price numbers before the sales demo, and browse the tax tools in our software directory alongside the broader tool counts in which accounting software employers ask for. And if you want a project that makes you better at either side, build a prior-year versus current-year comparison sheet that flags every line that moved more than 10%, which is half of what review is anyway, and then see how much of it you can hand to an AI assistant using what we covered in where AI fits in the tax workflow. Live roles are on the remote tax jobs page.
In the Journal of Accountancy's 2025 survey of 2,011 AICPA members, UltraTax CS led at 22.9%, then Drake Tax at 16.3%, Lacerte at 15.8% and CCH Axcess Tax at 12.5%.
The CCH family, appearing in 640 of 7,877 live tax postings in our data. UltraTax follows at 112, Lacerte at 73, Drake at 33 and ProSeries or ProConnect at 29.
It's the highest-rated product in the survey, at 4.4 overall, and the price satisfaction is unusually high. It's named in fewer postings, though, so learn it if you're headed for a small or mid-size practice and expect to pick up CCH or UltraTax if you're headed for a larger one.
Our postings point to ONESOURCE (526 mentions), Corptax (162) and Alteryx (207), plus Excel in 64% of tax postings.
Only about 9.6% of tax postings name a specific professional product, and another 906 say 'tax software' generically, so list what you've used and the number of returns or entities you handled. A full busy season in any professional package counts for more than the brand name.
Pick the return you dread reviewing, open a blank workbook and build the thing that checks it. The software names will keep changing, and the people who can show their own checking tool will keep getting the interview.